Post by account_disabled on Jan 3, 2024 11:05:38 GMT
Athe minutes establishing and sanctioning the contravention does not result in the overturning of the burden of proof which would be contrary to the interests of the violator but rather the exercise of the right to defence. Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section II of the Bucharest Court Bihor Court Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section CaraSeverin Court Arad Court Neam Court Civil Section I Giurgiu Court Civil Section Clrai Court Mure Court in another opinion the courts of sectors and Bucharest Podu.
Turcului Clrai LehliuGar Cornetu Sighetu Marmaiei Huedin Gherla Country Email List Flticeni Dorohoi Reita and Galati minority. . By Decision no. of May published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of May the Constitutional Court held that . Thus para. of art. of Government Ordinance no. establishes without distinction that the competent court to resolve the complaint verifies whether it was introduced within the deadline listens to the one who made it and the other cited persons among whom according to art. of the ordinance and the body that applied provided by law necessary to verify the legality and validity of the minutes and decides on the sanction.
The established compensation as well as on the measure of confiscation. The provisions of para. of art. of the ordinance provides that the court decision by which the complaint was resolved can be challenged with an appeal without its reasoning being mandatory. Also throughout the settlement of the complaint directed against the record of finding and sanctioning the contravention both at the court of first instance and in the appeal the violator can exercise his right to defense without any restrictions. At the same time the court competent to resolve the complaint directed against the record of finding and sanctioning the contravention is obliged to follow certain procedural rules.
Turcului Clrai LehliuGar Cornetu Sighetu Marmaiei Huedin Gherla Country Email List Flticeni Dorohoi Reita and Galati minority. . By Decision no. of May published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of May the Constitutional Court held that . Thus para. of art. of Government Ordinance no. establishes without distinction that the competent court to resolve the complaint verifies whether it was introduced within the deadline listens to the one who made it and the other cited persons among whom according to art. of the ordinance and the body that applied provided by law necessary to verify the legality and validity of the minutes and decides on the sanction.
The established compensation as well as on the measure of confiscation. The provisions of para. of art. of the ordinance provides that the court decision by which the complaint was resolved can be challenged with an appeal without its reasoning being mandatory. Also throughout the settlement of the complaint directed against the record of finding and sanctioning the contravention both at the court of first instance and in the appeal the violator can exercise his right to defense without any restrictions. At the same time the court competent to resolve the complaint directed against the record of finding and sanctioning the contravention is obliged to follow certain procedural rules.